Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Third Eye Retroscope Gives Docs a Better View of The Colon

Filed under: GI

The Third Eye Retroscope from Avantis Medical Systems (Sunnyvale, CA) is getting some good reviews in two studies just published in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The device works in conjunction with a standard colonoscope to look behind, kind of like a rear view mirror in a car. And as designed, this device is proving valuable in spotting polyps that would otherwise have gone unnoticed.

From an Avantis Medical press release:

The first study was led by Dr. Jerome D. Waye, Clinical Professor of Medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY. Titled “A Retrograde-Viewing Device Improves Detection of Adenomas in the Colon: A Prospective Efficacy Evaluation,” the study involved 14 investigators and 249 patients at 8 medical centers in the U.S.1 The investigators found that the Third Eye improved detection and removal of polyps by 13.2% compared to the colonoscope alone. For adenomas, the polyps that are most likely to become cancers over time, the additional detection rate with the Third Eye was 11.0% for lesions of all sizes. For medium-size adenomas (at least 6 mm in diameter), the additional detection rate with the Third Eye was 25.0%, and for large adenomas (at least 10 mm), they found 33.3% more with the Third Eye. Thus, the Third Eye not only allowed for identification of more polyps, but its greatest yield was in the detection of larger adenomas, which are further along in the progression to cancer.

The second study was led by Dr. Daniel C. DeMarco, Director of Endoscopy at Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX. Titled “Impact of Experience with a Retrograde-Viewing Device on Adenoma Detection Rates and Withdrawal Times during Colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope Study Group,” the study involved 298 patients at 9 U.S. sites, and was conducted by 17 investigators who had not previously used the device.2

Overall, beginning with the very first time they used the device, the Third Eye allowed the investigators to find 16.0% more adenomas in addition to those they were able to find with the colonoscope alone. However, after each investigator had gained some experience with the device by performing 15 procedures, their average additional adenoma detection rate with the Third Eye compared to the colonoscope alone was 25.0%. Again considering their overall results from start to finish, the endoscopists found a higher proportion of larger pre-cancerous adenomas that were hidden from the colonoscope by folds, including 24.3% more adenomas at least 6 mm in diameter and 19.0% more adenomas at least 10 mm.

Relevant articles in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Adenoma detection and retroscopy; Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group

Product page: Third Eye® Retroscope®

Flashbacks: Third Eye Retroscope Wins FDA OK ; It's a Retrospectroscope... It's a Rectospectroscope...No It's Retroscope!

Device demo video and more after the fold:

READ MORE...


email this article to a friend      print this!           comments and peer reviews (0)     






replies: 0 comments
Open comments are not moderated, although abusive and vulgar remarks may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Medgadget.com. Please consult our disclaimer.

add a comment
html tags: <b>, <i>, and <a>
examples: <b>Bold</b> <i>Italic</i>









Remember personal info?
(anonymous comments allowed)



click to make your selection boldclick to make your selection italicclick to add a link


Verification (needed to reduce spam):




Click the "Post" button only once!