Friday, January 8, 2010

Global Warming Beliefs and The Hippocratic Oath: How BMJ Leadership Fails on Both

Filed under: Medgadget Exclusive , Public Health , not funny


After two years, it's time we took another look at the practices and preachings of British Medical Journal's globe-trotting Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Fiona Godlee.

You may know of Dr. Godlee from her work editing one of our favorite journals (their recent Christmas issue is another gem). Or, you may know her from her outspoken activism regarding global warming. Indeed, she has used the pages of BMJ as a bully pulpit, even as she describes herself as a "climate criminal."

You can hit up the flashbacks at the bottom of this post to review our past interactions with Dr. Godlee (from those exchanges we created a page that updates her Carbon Footprint).

Recently, however, Dr. Godlee and her staff upped the ante, and we feel it's time to once again inquire into the discrepancies between what this woman and her company advocates, and what they do. In September 2009, BMJ together with Lancet has published an editorial proclaiming that if international leaders meeting for UN talks in Copenhagen do not agree to radical reductions in carbon emissions, the world will face an inevitable "global health catastrophe". In addition, in June 2009, BMJ has published yet another editorial that calls for suspension of medical conferences to combat the Global Warming (the opinion piece, "Are international medical conferences an outdated luxury the planet can't afford? Yes," by Dr. Malcolm Green, professor emeritus of respiratory medicine from Imperial College, is reminiscent of the original editorial by Dr. Fiona Godlee, that has asked all clinicians, back in 2007, to suspend travels to medical conferences to save the planet from carbon dioxide).

We must point this out: If Dr. Godlee and BMJ believe that Anthropomorphic Global Warming constitutes the number one threat to the health of humanity, she and her coworkers are actively engaged into practices that directly contradict their own opinions and, even the Hippocratic Oath itself.

Back in 2007, in response to prior statements on her own blog, in articles, in multiple international conferences, and even on our own website, we wrote an open letter to Dr. Godlee and the rest of BMJ leadership to demonstrate concrete actions to reduce the carbon footprint of the publication. Those calls for the last two years went unanswered:

1. BMJ continues to chop and reprocess trees. BMJ Group still distributes its pulp publication all over the world, via trucks, ships, planes, trains, and other modes of transportation.

2. Dr. Godlee and other BMJ editors continue to travel the world over. In the last two years, she and her colleagues have attended conferences in the following places (all documented attendances): Vancouver, BC, Canada, Castro Brothers' Havana, Cuba, African country of Mali (if you want to know where Mali is and what she did there, check out her blog post), Singapore, Amsterdam, Atlanta, Georgia, Oxford, UK, Birmingham, UK, Glasgow, Scotland, Paris, France, Vienna, Austria, Gastein, Austria, Verona, Italy, Boston, Massachusetts, Copenhagen, Denmark and more. To view the full extend of documented BMJ leadership's sightings, check out the interactive map here.

3. While the journal is touting to others to "lead by example," and to abstain from meetings, BMJ is keeping its medical conferences business strong. A quick online search reveals a large number of upcoming medical conferences, all sponsored or organized by BMJ Group, including the conference in Nice, France and many BMJ Masterclasses slated all over the UK. Furthermore, while its editors preach restraint to the rest of us, BMJ Group continues to proselytize its conferences business in a special webpage.

Now it's 2010. We don't want to debate the details of Anthropomorphic Global Warming, but we can accept and appreciate that BMJ's own editorial has stated global warming "leaves no room for complacency." The doctors at BMJ believe that global warming is a threat to health, and CO2, in essence, is a poison. They demand action, from all of us.

Yet they continue to travel extensively, and unnecessarily, generating patient-killing poisons as a byproduct of their business.

We cannot help but recall the Third Tenet of the Hippocratic Oath: "I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect.".

BMJ's leadership, and specifically Dr. Godlee, really must take the following steps to reduce and eliminate the company's carbon footprint:

1. BMJ has to stop production and distribution of all its print publications in Europe, North America, Australia, and other parts of the world that have broad internet penetration.

2. BMJ has to curtail world wide travels of all of its leaders, at least of those who believe in the Anthropomorphic Global Warming and its effect on health, and vigorously promote teleconferencing.

3. If the company leadership is asking other clinicians to abstain from the medical conference travels, BMJ should close its conference business, and transition its educational arm to an online format.

4. To be responsible, BMJ should provide the medical community with a transparent and detailed plan on how the company will tackle the transition to a minimal carbon footprint.

Before BMJ and its leadership asks the medical community (again) to make sacrifices, a journal with their reputation should "lead by example," take its own words seriously, and properly protect our patients -- the planet's people.

On the web: Carbon Footprint of Dr. Fiona Godlee, Editor of the British Medical Journal...

Flashbacks: BMJ Urges Others, Fails to "Lead by Example" on Climate Change; Fionagate: An Illustrated, Interactive Website; Feet to the Fire: Responding to Dr. Godlee ; Carbon Footprint, or How to Spot Other People's Garbage

email this article to a friend      print this!           comments and peer reviews (9)






replies: 9 comments
Open comments are not moderated, although abusive and vulgar remarks may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Medgadget.com. Please consult our disclaimer.

I wouldn't want her as my physician. She doesn't understand the scientific method. If she dd understand science she'd know that AGW is a HOAX built upon FRAUD. Of course, facts never matter to leftists.


Posted by: Anon
on January 6, 2010 06:38 PM GMT

It is time for a zero-tolerance for the AGW nuts and criminals who have stolen millions upon millions of dollars from gullible fools.

Zero-Tolerance!!


Posted by: LogicalUS
on January 6, 2010 06:42 PM GMT

Check out the footprints of yet another member of the well travelled BMJ club.....yet another who issues endless pious statements through the BMJ and from her position on endless committees, including until recently, the BMJ Chair of Ethics. ie Iona Heath GP, Caversham Group (Socialist) Practice, President College of GPs. It is not just the footsteps which stick in the throat, it is so often that their actions so contradict their messages..high minded conferences to discuss the 'deprived' costing more in freebies than 'the poor' see in a lifetime - free accomodation, travel, meals, endless bottles of water, tea and coffee and snacks thrroughout - to say nothing of accomodation provided for partners and spouses and the unbelievably generous additional carrots in the way of free sightseeing trips, cultural events etc. Tax payers may well question why these people need extra rewards to do the job they are being highly paid for already. But it is not just the high profile events which suck up funds.check out the lower level less publicised meetings and conferences such as held by the Balint Society. Attendees incentives include trips, gorgeous hotels in scenic surroundings , all paid for by you know who.


Posted by: susanne
on January 8, 2010 09:31 AM GMT

What's really happening here, is that anthropogenic climate change is a fundamental assault on right wing ideology and its solution requires a worldwide implementation of liberal policies that will undercut right wing ideas at every level well into the future.

Right wingers maybe do not grasp this fear consciously, but intuitively everything about this issue stinks for them.

Denial is the only way to save their worldview. In short, global warming denial has become an integral part of conservative identity politics, because right wingers trust who they trust. Not who is logical, rational or reasonable to trust.

Most people (in fact, all, if one thinks about it) cannot determine for themselves just how large a disputed risk is, whether of environmental catastrophe from global warming, so they defer to those whom they find credible to tell them which risk claims and supporting evidence to believe and which to disbelieve.

If Right Wingers perceive Limbaugh, Beck, Brownback, Palin, Fox News, etc. as sharing their values the sorts of qualities, including knowledge, honesty, and shared interest, then that makes their positions on global warming extremely credible, even if they have no basis in science.


Posted by: nipsip
on January 10, 2010 10:51 AM GMT

nipsip:

Your "right wingers" comment is off the topic. Here we have a company and its leadership preaching one thing to the medical community, while they engage in globe trotting and medical conferences business.

I don't know about the right wingers, but BMJ's hypocrisy is quite revealing.


Posted by: DrO
on January 10, 2010 05:33 PM GMT

Off topic but...

Anthropogenic global warming is just too good to be true.

We *wish* we could change the weather!


Posted by:
on January 10, 2010 10:03 PM GMT

My post was directed to the right winger who runs this website and to the right wingers who are in denial.

IMO, every single medical journal ought to be explaining the health outcomes of global warming denial.


Posted by: nipsip
on January 11, 2010 07:30 AM GMT

Nipsip,

What's really happening here is that you fail to recognize that your "worldview" has been shaped by those that you "perceive" to share your values. That is - Al Gore, Michael Moore, CNN and the like.

Please do not assume to be so enlightented by your obvious leftist bias as to make such hypocritical and stereotypic comments in the future.

Finally, I would love to hear more about any research "explaining the health care outcomes of global warming denial". I find it laughable to think that such a connection has been made or that an article on the subject would be accepted and published by any respectable peer-reviewed medical journal.


Posted by: Right Winger
on January 13, 2010 06:59 AM GMT

To continue the BMJ theme - check out the latest contribution from Trisha Greenhalgh GP .After accepting an invitation to a conference aboad with grossly unecessary five star hotel accomodation and enjoying free meals at stylish resteraunts ,Trisha and her friends rather sneered behing their hands at their hosts and 'decamped to a bohemian part of town'. Trisha is another person who spends a good part of her well rewarded career teaching, observing and commenting on others' behaviour. She may consider that taking advantage of corporate hospitality is fair game but the waste of resouces is still unacceptable...and of course tax payers are still paying for her time and have a right to comment on how she uses it. In this piece Trisha focuses on her irritation with being obliged to be 'made up' for her presentation.She has a point but misses the fact that her own attitude encourages this kind of ego massging waste of ressources.


Posted by: susanne
on January 29, 2010 04:44 AM GMT

add a comment
html tags: <b>, <i>, and <a>
examples: <b>Bold</b> <i>Italic</i>









Remember personal info?
(anonymous comments allowed)



click to make your selection boldclick to make your selection italicclick to add a link


Verification (needed to reduce spam):




Click the "Post" button only once!