Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Medical Pixie Dust: Is It Finally Here?

Filed under: in the news...

An Ohio man recently chopped off a part of his finger while playing with a model plane rotor. Luckily for Mr Lee Spievak, his brother Alan is a researcher within the field of regenerative medicine, and had access to Dr Stephen Badylak's "pixie dust", developed at the University of Pittsburgh.

The process [Dr Stephen Badylak] has been pioneering over the last few years involves scraping the cells from the lining of a pig's bladder. The remaining tissue is then placed into acid, "cleaned" of all cells, and dried out.

It can be turned into sheets, or a powder. It looks like a simple process, but of course the science is complex.

"There are all sorts of signals in the body," explains Dr Badylak. "We have got signals that are good for forming scar, and others that are good for regenerating tissues. "One way to think about these matrices is that we have taken out many of the stimuli for scar tissue formation and left those signals that were always there anyway for constructive remodelling."

In other words when the extra cellular matrix is put on a wound, scientists believe it stimulates cells in the tissue to grow rather than scar.

If they can perfect the technique, it might mean one day they could repair not just a severed finger, but severely burnt skin, or even damaged organs.

More from the BBC with video of the patient and Dr Badylak explaining the production process...

UPDATE: A Note on Medical Pixie Dust

email this article to a friend      print this!      add this article ... Add this article to: digg StumbleUpon Facebook      comments and peer reviews (3)






replies: 3 comments
Open comments are not moderated, although abusive and vulgar remarks may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Medgadget.com. Please consult our disclaimer.

Are you kidding? This was clearly bullshit when it broke 2 weeks ago, and any self-respecting med student should be able to see why. And then it was debunked by every major news outlet:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/03/medicalresearch.health

Weak shit medgadget


Posted by: Matt Swe
on May 6, 2008 06:42 AM GMT

I saw this story on the front page of Fox News when it broke and thought I was missing something about why it was news worthy. This is a good example of media outlets running with less than all of the facts. If you want to see some really funny instances of the media screwing up you need to look up theonion.com on wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_onion.

Those of you that are familiar with the onion will find this quite entertaining and those of you that don't know the onion need to check it out.


Posted by: VaricoseDoc
on May 6, 2008 11:36 PM GMT

Methinks you've been a wee bit too credulous about this. Actually, you've been way too credulous, as this story looks like a load of B.S.

See:

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=113


Posted by: Orac
on May 8, 2008 05:36 AM GMT

add a comment
html tags: <b>, <i>, and <a>
examples: <b>Bold</b> <i>Italic</i>









Remember personal info?
(anonymous comments allowed)



click to make your selection boldclick to make your selection italicclick to add a link


Hello Human!

Enter the above anti-spambot
Turing code:





Click the "Post" button only once!