Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Not Free Will After All?

Filed under: in the news...


The latest neurophysiology research is showing that unconscious processes in the brain develop up to seven seconds before the conscious decision is made, and these processes could be predictive of the decision itself. Here's what investigators from the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in Leipzig, in collaboration with the Charité University Hospital and the Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience in Berlin, have demonstrated, as reported by the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science:

The researchers from the group of Professor John-Dylan Haynes used a brain scanner to investigate what happens in the human brain just before a decision is made. "Many processes in the brain occur automatically and without involvement of our consciousness. This prevents our mind from being overloaded by simple routine tasks. But when it comes to decisions we tend to assume they are made by our conscious mind. This is questioned by our current findings." (Nature Neuroscience, April 13th 2008)

In the study, participants could freely decide if they wanted to press a button with their left or right hand. They were free to make this decision whenever they wanted, but had to remember at which time they felt they had made up their mind. The aim of the experiment was to find out what happens in the brain in the period just before the person felt the decision was made. The researchers found that it was possible to predict from brain signals which option participants would take already seven seconds before they consciously made their decision. Normally researchers look at what happens when the decision is made, but not atwhat happens several seconds before. The fact that decisions can be predicted so long before they are made is a astonishing finding.

This unprecedented prediction of a free decision was made possible by sophisticated computer programs that were trained to recognize typical brain activity patterns preceding each of the two choices. Micropatterns of activity in the frontopolar cortex were predictive of the choices even before participants knew which option they were going to choose. The decision could not be predicted perfectly, but prediction was clearly above chance. This suggests that the decision is unconsciously prepared ahead of time but the final decision might still be reversible.

"Most researchers investigate what happens when people have to decide immediately, typically as a rapid response to an event in our environment. Here we were focusing on the more interesting decisions that are made in a more natural, self-paced manner", Haynes explains.

More than 20 years ago the American brain scientist Benjamin Libet found a brain signal, the so-called "readiness-potential" that occurred a fraction of a second before a conscious decision. Libet’s experiments were highly controversial and sparked a huge debate. Many scientists argued that if our decisions are prepared unconsciously by the brain, then our feeling of "free will" must be an illusion. In this view, it is the brain that makes the decision, not a person’s conscious mind. Libet’s experiments were particularly controversial because he found only a brief time delay between brain activity and the conscious decision.

In contrast, Haynes and colleagues now show that brain activity predicts even up to 7 seconds ahead of time how a person is going to decide. But they also warn that the study does not finally rule out free will: "Our study shows that decisions are unconsciously prepared much longer ahead than previously thought. But we do not know yet where the final decision is made. We need to investigate whether a decision prepared by these brain areas can still be reversed."

Press release: Unconscious decisions in the brain...

email this article to a friend      print this!           comments and peer reviews (2)






replies: 2 comments
Open comments are not moderated, although abusive and vulgar remarks may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Medgadget.com. Please consult our disclaimer.

This article shows very interesting results. However what is the definition of consciousness? In my opinion, consciousness is the result of high processing power and adaptiveness of our brain. Its so obvious that any decision is made as a result of a chain of biochemical reactions in the the brain. This is what happens in all life forms. Each life form decides what do do in any situation. But Human decisions depend on more complex variables like memories, experiments, etc.; that is only because of our highly complex and dynamic brain comparing to other known life forms.
If we are to talk about something else that manages the natural decision making process, we'll have to talk about philosophical subjects like soul.

My conclusion is that this discovery proves the most obvious thing that there is no "Free Will". Any decision and action is based on some prior facts and if we don't change the facts we'll not get different results, just like mathematical formulas. In my opinion we can never truly say if we have free will or not because we are limited to our world and our system. If we don't get out of this system's context and analyze it from out side (maybe another world) then we may not be able to conclude this fact for sure and that is because we are limited to the limitations that our world has made for us.
If we say that there is no other world, after-life or anything like that then we are just a part of a completely predictable system and we should accept that free will has no meaning in a system that all its parts act based on defined formulas. Our world contains no randomness, no one has ever been able to create something randomly. Without true randomness free will gets no meaning. Any decision is based on prior facts and each one of those facts is based on another group of facts so with enough knowledge about brain and our world's functionality anyone will be able to predict anything in the future.
But if we accept that we have "Free Will" then we need to presume that there is something such as another higher level world. This results in presuming another personality dimension for human, maybe soul, that controls the body and its functionality based on another kind of rules, processes and logic or none at all that we can't understand yet.


Posted by: O. Askari
on April 15, 2008 10:56 PM GMT

This is a hopelessly bad argument; the results of this study have nothing to do with the free will issue at all. This is simply a case of experts in one field (neurophysiology) thinking they are experts in another field (philosophy) that they seem to know very little about. See my analysis here.


Posted by: Roderick T. Long
on April 18, 2008 11:08 AM GMT

add a comment
html tags: <b>, <i>, and <a>
examples: <b>Bold</b> <i>Italic</i>









Remember personal info?
(anonymous comments allowed)



click to make your selection boldclick to make your selection italicclick to add a link


Hello Human!

Enter the above anti-spambot
Turing code:





Click the "Post" button only once!