Wednesday, December 20, 2006

4800-Year-Old Artificial Eyeball

Filed under: the good old days...

From the announcement by the Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies, an educational and research group out of UK:

Archaeologists in Burnt City announced unprecedented discovery of an artificial eyeball, dated to 4800 years ago, in this historic site.

Announcing this news, director of Burnt City archaeology excavation team, Mansur Sajadi, said that this eyeball belongs to a sturdy woman who was between 25 to 30 years of age at the time of death. Skeletal remains of the woman were found in grave number 6705 of Burnt City's cemetery.

Regarding the material used to make this artificial eyeball, Sajadi said: "The material this artificial eyeball is made of has not yet been determined and will be assessed through later testing. However, at first glance it seems natural tar mixed with animal fat has been used in making it."

Initial studies on the eyeball also suggest formation of an abscess in the eyelid due to long-term contact with the eyeball. Moreover, remaining eyelid tissues are still evident on this artificial eyeball.

According to Sajadi, even the most delicate eye capillaries were drawn on this eyeball using golden wires with a thickness measuring less than half a millimetre. There are also some parallel lines around the pupil forming a diamond shape. Two holes are also seen on the sides of this eyeball to hold it in the eye socket.

Initial anthropological studies on the remaining skeleton of the woman to which this artificial eyeball belong revealed that she was a hybrid woman who died 4800 years ago between the ages of 25 to 30.

A number of clay vessels, ornamental beads, a leather sack, and a bronze mirror have also been found in the grave of this woman.

Link...

(hat tip: digg)

email this article to a friend      print this!           comments and peer reviews (5)






replies: 5 comments
Open comments are not moderated, although abusive and vulgar remarks may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Medgadget.com. Please consult our disclaimer.

How was the definition of "hybrid woman" derived?

thanks
Bill


Posted by: Bill Cornelius
on December 21, 2006 11:51 AM GMT

Is it possible that the people who cared enough about that woman to give her a decent and respectful burial intended her to stay buried and not be pawed over like trinkets at a flea market?

If you feel the need to dig up bodies, take a backhoe to your grandmother and keep it in the family.


Posted by: John Webster
on December 21, 2006 03:29 PM GMT

WHAT, on earth, is a hybrid woman? Does STOUT refer to her shape or her health? What do you think she died of? The eye itself? Thanks for the pictures.


Posted by: Oldfart
on December 21, 2006 04:41 PM GMT

@John Webster
We learn a great deal about human history and human nature via archaeology. So by all means please dig up my grandmother and me in the centuries to come. If you are so offended by all this, what are you doing on the Medgadget site reading about this archaeological find - surely you had to realize it would have been found with human remains, otherwise it would have been seen as nothing more than a marble or child's toy.


Posted by: Mike
on December 22, 2006 07:07 AM GMT

If archaeology were about learning and education the human remains of that woman and her grave goods would be reburied after being studied. That's not likely to happen, archaeology is mostly grave robbing to fill local museum sideshows and a works program for state licensed looters unfit for a real job outside their ivory towers.

If you wish to end up as a curiosity in a future museum or garage sale so be it, but the people who buried that woman probably couldn't have imagined anyone so barbaric and debased that they would steal from the dead and probably wouldn't have given permission to strangers to violate her grave.

In the current state of events, her eye is a childs toy - and can't be mistaken for anything else.


Posted by: John Webster
on December 23, 2006 07:56 AM GMT