Wednesday, December 7, 2005

Quantum Dots Nanosensor Detects DNA

Filed under: Nanomedicine

Johns Hopkins is releasing news about a potentially revolutionary ultrasensitive DNA nanosensor:

Using tiny semiconductor crystals, biological probes and a laser, Johns Hopkins University engineers have developed a new method of finding specific sequences of DNA by making them light up beneath a microscope. The researchers, who say the technique will have important uses in medical research, demonstrated its potential in their lab by detecting a sample of DNA containing a mutation linked to ovarian cancer.

The Johns Hopkins team described the new DNA nanosensor in a paper published in the November 2005 issue of the journal Nature Materials...

Quantum dots are crystals of semiconductor material, whose sizes are only in the range of a few nanometers across. (A nanometer is one-billionth of a meter.) They are traditionally used in electronic circuitry. In recent years, however, scientists have begun to explore their use in biological projects.

Wang, an assistant professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Whitaker Biomedical Engineering Institute at Johns Hopkins, led his team in exploiting an important property of quantum dots: They can easily transfer energy. When a laser shines on a quantum dot, it can pass the energy on to a nearby molecule, which in turn emits a fluorescent glow that is visible under a microscope.

But quantum dots alone cannot find and identify DNA strands. For that, the Johns Hopkins team used two biological probes made of synthetic DNA. Each of these probes is a complement to the DNA sequence the researchers are searching for. Therefore, the probes seek out and bind to the target DNA.

Each DNA probe also has an important partner. Attached to one is a Cy5 molecule that glows when it receives energy. Attached to the second probe is a molecule called biotin. Biotin sticks to yet another molecule called streptavidin, which coats the surface of the quantum dot.

DNA probes capture the target strands of DNA, then stick to a quantum dot, which is a tiny crystal of semiconductor material. When a laser shines on the quantum dot, it transfers the energy to the DNA probes, which light up through a process called fluorescence resonance energy transfer or FRET.

To create their nanosensor, the researchers mixed the two DNA probes, plus a quantum dot, in a lab dish containing the DNA they were trying to detect. Then nature took its course. First, the two DNA probes linked up to the target DNA strand, holding it in a sandwich-like embrace. Then the biotin on one of the probes caused the DNA "sandwich" to stick to the surface of the quantum dot.

Finally, when the researchers shined a laser on the mix, the quantum dot passed the energy on to the Cy5 molecule that was attached to the second probe. The Cy5 released this energy as a fluorescent glow. If the target DNA had not been present in the solution, the four components would not have joined together, and the distinctive glow would not have appeared. Each quantum dot can connect to up to about 60 DNA sequences, making the combined glow even brighter and easier to see.

Picture caption: DNA probes capture the target strands of DNA, then stick to a quantum dot, which is a tiny crystal of semiconductor material. When a laser shines on the quantum dot, it transfers the energy to the DNA probes, which light up through a process called fluorescence resonance energy transfer or FRET.

The press release...

Flashback: Medgadget DNA chip archive.

email this article to a friend      print this!           comments and peer reviews (4)






replies: 4 comments
Open comments are not moderated, although abusive and vulgar remarks may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Medgadget.com. Please consult our disclaimer.

People with Down syndrome do not have a disease. Period.
If Down syndrome could be eradiacated without eradicating people with Down syndrome, I would be all for it. Would I love for my daughter to be "normal" "typical" whatever? YES! Do I love her for who she is? YES, UNCONDITIONALLY! She is my child, how could I not!?!?!
We have figured out that if you take certain vitamins before becoming pregnant, you significantly reduce the risk of having a child with Spina bifida. Is that same type of research being done for people with Down syndrome? Is there something we can do to identify what happens to make the extra 21st chromosome?
We may never know, because we spend money on trying to figure out if a pre-born baby has some genetic defect, rather than how to prevent it in the first place. Then the rest of our money is spent on how to rid our society of these "genetic defects" rather than see the contribution that they can make.
I can say that I have loved more, laughed more, smiled more, cried more and felt more alive in the last three years since my daughter with Down syndrome (take note, it's not "Down's syndrome, Downies, down sydrome child, or Downs syndrome...it is Down syndrome) was born.


Posted by: Juliette
on November 21, 2005 09:47 PM GMT

The first descriptions of the syndrome, in The Lancet in the 1950's, were grouped as "Down's Syndrome" with the apostrophe. Many British journals still favor that moniker.


Posted by: Nick
on November 21, 2005 10:56 PM GMT

well now my sister is down sydrome and i love her more then anythin she is only a couple years younger then me and she is almost the same as me i know there is alot of different severites of down syndrome but i still say that no matter what they are sitll children and they shouldnt be treated like anything differnt. When my lil sister is picked on i return the favor to those who do it i love my lil sister and i agree wit the first lady that rote sumthin bout down syndrome we waste all the time we have on catchin it early and aborting it when we could spend the same amount of time figuring out how it happens and how to prevent it so that the world is a better place i think that down syndromes have all the right in the world and i favor these strong children.


Posted by: josh anstead
on April 7, 2006 08:51 AM GMT

deleted


Posted by: john kerry
on July 17, 2006 12:27 AM GMT