Friday, September 30, 2005

The E-Meter: Still Crazy After all These Years

Filed under: the good old days...

E-MeterWe were very excited when rumors surfaced about a series of lectures from Tom Cruise, free on the web, about scientology and psychiatry. At last, we thought, a chance to glimpse the non-evidence-based innards of Hollywood's favorite pasttime, without paying exorbitant fees (and yes, I'm talking about Scientology, not psychiatry):

Continuing his vigorous advocacy for Scientology's solutions to mental health problems, Tom Cruise will deliver a series of four lectures on topics related to "The Modern Science of Mental Health" beginning next month....

The first lecture, set for October 15, is titled "How Psychiatry Invented Schizophrenia, and What Scientologists Can Do About It".

The second lecture, tentatively scheduled for October 22, is on "Handling Sexual Dis-Orientation: Out of the Closet and Into the Auditing Room".

The topic of the third lecture, in early November, will be "Diagnosis and Treatment of So-Called Clinical Depression with the Hubbard Mark Super VII Quantum Electropsychometer".

Well, the Tom Cruise Lecture Series may be a hoax, but we were intrigued by the electropsychometer and found it's a real gadget (if not actually a medical device):

"The E-meter is a skin galvanometer, similar to those used in giving lie detector tests. The subject or "preclear" holds in his hands two tin soup cans, which are linked to the electrical apparatus. A needle on the apparatus registers changes in the electrical resistance of the subject's skin. The auditor asks questions of the subject, and the movement of the needle is apparently used as a check of the emotional reaction to the questions. According to complex rules and procedures set out in Scientology publications, the auditor can interpret the movements of the needle after certain prescribed questions are asked, and use them in diagnosing the mental and spiritual condition of the subject."

Early government inquires into the E-meter revealed some limitations:

These experts also explained that the machine was not really a measure of skin resistance at all, but partially a reading of how firmly the individual was grasping the can; if the person squeezed the can, there was more contact, and apparent skin resistance would drop. If he held the cans loosely, the apparent skin resistance would simply increase.

Scientologists, on the other hand, claim that the E-meter is so sensitive that it will react not only when a person is holding onto it, but also when it is placed on a tomato -- garden variety that is. While some people would view this as an argument against the meter, Scientologists feel that this proves its validity and that it also supports their hypothesis that plants have feelings like humans.

And now, the E-meter's status is not unlike that of pro wrestling: everyone agrees it's not real, but interested parties go through the motions for their own reasons:

The US Food & Drug Administration raided Scientology on January 4, 1963 and seized hundreds of E-meters as illegal medical devices. The incident is described in Jon Atack's book, A Piece of Blue Sky, and in this essay by Stephen Barrett, M.D. Since that time, meters have been required to carry a disclaimer stating that they are purely a religious artifact...

This subsequent court decision says in part: "As a matter of formal doctrine, the Church professes to have abandoned any contention that there is a scientific basis for claiming cures resulting from E-meter use..."

More from Secrets of Scientology...

That's all for this week. Thank you for stopping by. See you on Monday.

email this article to a friend      print this!           comments and peer reviews (9)






replies: 9 comments
Open comments are not moderated, although abusive and vulgar remarks may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Medgadget.com. Please consult our disclaimer.

The original article kind of shows the author doesn't really know much about the e-meter, and may very well have never seen one himself.

You can easily check the information below by simply trying it yourself. Go to the nearest church of scientology and ask them to try. They won't bite. That way you will be able to decide for yourself what's what and how it works.

1. Correct. An e-meter cures nothing. Like, say, a CAT scan. The CAT scan gets you pictures and data, but all by itself, it cures absolutely nothing. An e-meter will not cure anyone or do anything beyond providing measures of minute electrical changes. Those measures are extremely precise and can be used by a trained practitionner to help a person locate and erase painful emotions and thoughts.

2. Yes, an e-meter reacts when you squeeze or release the cans. This is what we call a "body motion read". (a read is a motion of the needle, falling on one side). A body motion read is caracterized by a delay.

Meaning if you squeeze or release the cans, the needle will move about one second later.

However, if you think of something, the needle will move *instantly*. no delay there.

A properly trained person will be able to make the difference between the meaningless body motion reads and reads caused by thought.

Anyone can observe the difference during a test. It take quite a bit of training however to use it to help someone else.

If you want to check the data above, you don't need to be an expert. Just go to a church of scientology and ask them to do a test to see how the e-meter works.

That will not make you an expert, or something, but at least you will see for yourself what that machine can do. A machine that can track your thoughts. Guess it's worth checking out if it really works or not.

NB: It doesn't detect lies. It detects emotions and thoughts.

I hope this will help you understand a little better what you are talking about, but bottom line is that you don't have to believe me. Just give it a try and figure it out for yourself..


Posted by: Sylvain Galibert
on October 1, 2005 12:10 AM GMT

Yes, you can try the e-meter yourself at the local org...or you can stop at one of many tables Scientology sets up to try to recruit new members. Take a "Stress Test" with the e-meter! Come one, come all!

How do you justify using a "religious artifact" such as an e-meter for something as frivoulous as a stress test? Especially because each e-meter (and every single publication put out by Scientology) must contain this Federally mandated paragragh:

HUBBARD ELECTROMETER MANUFACTURING

"By itself, this meter does nothing. It is solely for the guide of Ministers of the Church in Confessionals and pastoral counselling. The Electrometer is not medically or scientifically capable of improving the health or bodily function of anyone and is for religious use by students and Ministers of the Church of Scientology only. HUBBARD, E-METER and SCIENTOLOGY are trademarks and service marks owned by RTC and used with its permission."


Find out more about the E-Meter here:

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Secrets/E-Meter/

And more about Scientology here:

http://www.xenu.net/

Best wishes,

Mark Bunker
www.xenutv.com


Posted by: Mark Bunker
on October 2, 2005 01:00 AM GMT

Funny though - the author of this piece never interviewed a single Scientologist. If I were to write a piece about the Cello, I might think of asking a cellist how the instrument is played. Were I to write about computers, I might ask a computer guy how they re put together and how they run.

E-meters are used by Scientologists. Writing a piece and not deigning to ask one of the millions of Scientologists a single question is poignantly obtuse.


Posted by: Greg
on October 3, 2005 06:02 PM GMT

Greg,

The E-meter is described by Scientologists as basically a medical device. Yes there are legal ramifications that make Scientologists provide some small print that states otherwise, but a layman wouldn't know that.
So, this being touted as a medical device, we asked our staff doctors and they wrote what they thought. Seems to me that a medical journal should be talking to doctors about medical devices. Talking to a Scientologist will get you propaganda, not a medical opinion, even though it might sound like a medical opinion. We don't talk to Scientologists about this just like we don't talk to Christian Scientists or the Amish about their medical views, because they are effectively irrelevant to a scientific discussion.
And as far as your general point about having to talk to a specialist, you can, for example, learn about electricity without asking an electrician. You can learn how a car works without talking to a mechanic. And just the same, the E-meter is just a device, the properties of which can be effectively described without needing to be a Scientology priest..
And if you are a Scientologist, why don't you comment on what you think our errors were, instead of criticizing our methods?


Posted by: Bruder
on October 4, 2005 02:10 PM GMT

About the comments on TV regarding pain medicine and silence during delivery, where I come from, women give birth without pain medicine and not make a sound during delivery all the time. I don't know how it relates to scientology but we call it 'Pohnpeian Pride' and it's everything that makes you a woman.

"Katie, it happens everyday, and it's what makes you a real woman!!!!!"

The commets on the TV that says "it's impossible not to make a sound during delivery" is not TRUE, it happens everyday in my small country called 'Micronesia or Federated States of Micronesia'.


Posted by: Rose David
on October 8, 2005 12:41 PM GMT

No shit, Rose David! Some of the highest levels of obesity in the world is in Micronesia. So it is no surprize that 300lb+ women don't make a peep.

Any input from Samoans on this one?


Posted by: Mikeeee
on October 8, 2005 12:52 PM GMT

Sylvain Galibert,

For the record, I just contacted the Church of Scientology of New York to ask whether we can try out the e-meter. I was told that because it is a "religous artifact", they will not grant us access to it. So, Sylvain, it looks like claims can be made but not confirmed by outsiders. Basically, I followed your advice and it didn't help resolve this dilemma. So, if you can help organizing a demonstration of the e-meter, we will gladly check it out. But at this point, we'll have to remain sceptical.


Posted by: Bruder
on January 9, 2006 08:41 AM GMT

Dear Bruder,

Sorry for the delay getting back to you, I completely missed your post.

I think there must have been a misunderstanding.

You can not take away an e-meter to home testing or play around with it.It's not a toy. You may however go to a church and do a free stress test, and ask just about as many questions as you want.

I see no reason this request would not be granted as we regularly do such demonstrations in the street with just about anyone.

I am not in New York - never even been there - so it would be a bit difficult for me to arrange an appointment, but really this isn't difficult at all.

All you have to do is walk in and say you have read some stuff about the e-meter, and that you would like to be given a free stress test. Unless you are impolite in your request or have an history of slandering the Church, I see no reason this would be a problem.

If you were in Thailand, I could easily arrange that, but it looks like you are not exactly in my neighborghood.


Posted by: Sylvain
on May 25, 2006 01:26 PM GMT

Sylvain,

Perhaps the church in Thailand has a somewhat friendlier attitude. But I called four different churches in the United States, including the New York one, and I was either told that they'll call me back, which they never did, or that it is a "religious artifact", and therefore cannot be simply tried out. I did not ask to take it out of the church or do anything with it beyond the test that its supposed to administer.
Pure and simple, they did not want me to check it out. I have no history of any animosity towards the Church of Scientology, and was somewhat confused at the reaction I got on the phone.
Maybe you guys should consider forming a Thai Protestantism within your church, cause it seems like you're on different pages here.


Posted by: Bruder
on May 25, 2006 01:51 PM GMT