Thursday, February 10, 2005

Virtual 3D surgical patient

Filed under: Neurological Surgery , Surgery

Virtual surgical patient by Atamai
The London Free Press of Ontario has a story about the development of a virtual surgical patient by Atamai Inc., in collaboration with Hollywood:

A small London software company has teamed with Hollywood special effects wizards to create a surgeon's diagnostic dream -- the virtual patient. The software designed by Atamai Inc. of London produces a lifelike 3-D image allowing surgeons to look inside a patient's brain or beating heart before and during an operation.

"It's a little bit like Superman's X-ray vision. . . . It guides your direction through the brain to a deep-seated tumour," said Atamai president Dr. Yves Starreveld, a neurosurgeon at London Health Sciences Centre.

The technology -- developed by researchers, the London software company and a California high-tech giant -- has yielded what backers say is the first virtual patient.

Atamai's partner is Silicon Graphics Inc., a California company that developed the visual effects technology used in such blockbuster movies as Shrek and Lord of the Rings.

Starreveld has already used the virtual patient device to perform epilepsy brain surgeries. Hospitals in Calgary, Halifax and Norway also are testing the device.

The virtual patient is expected to be vital in "keyhole" surgery, which uses the smallest possible incisions.

"In the simplest terms, it's helping me decide where to make the hole in someone's head to find a brain tumour," Starreveld said.

The virtual patient also could be a powerful tool in performing long-distance robotic surgery. That technique, pioneered in London, allows a surgeon to use a computer and an electronic link to perform surgery on a patient at another site.

... the software combines information from other systems, including MRI, CT scan and ultrasound, to deliver a precise image of a real patient in real time. He said the imaging system will be a great training and education tool.

More at Atamai...

email this article to a friend      print this!           comments and peer reviews (1)






replies: 1 comments
Open comments are not moderated, although abusive and vulgar remarks may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Medgadget.com. Please consult our disclaimer.

My wife was a patient who received NoVavision's VRT for eight months. She had been encouraged to try this treatment and we were led to believe that there was a greater than 60% chance that she would improve significantly, possibly even to drive again. After eight months of twice-a-day hour-long sessions, there was no apparent improvement from this treatment which cost $6,000.00. NovaVision claimed that their testing showed a "slight improvement" in peripheral response to light stimulii but I am suspicious of the claims made by NovaVision, and I feel that we were enticed by extravagant suggestions of impressive improvement. There was also a hint that Medicare or our secondary insurance would cover the $6000.00 cost, which of course it did not.
Dr. Gil Gaudia


Posted by: Dr. Gil Gaudia
on May 2, 2005 07:31 AM GMT