Friday, February 25, 2005

VeriChip

Filed under: Informatics

VeriChipDC's very own WUSA Channel 9 reports about the FDA-approved VeriChip:

Just like the barcode on a can of tomatoes, reduced to a number in a fraction of a second and linked to a computer database, people are voluntarily being bar-coded.

The number is stored within a tiny glass chip that's the size of a grain of rice and surgically implanted just under the skin.

What it is, is a VeriChip, a radio-frequency i.d tag by a company called Applied Digital. The chip is loaded with whatever personal information you choose.

That can include your Social Security number, insurance, health information or even name and address.

A special reader has to be within a few inches to access your 16 digit number. To access your computer file, a password is needed.

Its original intent was for medical emergencies. In fact the company is about to give chip readers to 200 Emergency Rooms in America for free.

But Verichips could someday be implanted in our military with information, like next of kin.

Top secret government officials could use them to gain access to offices or files, or to anyone required to give i.d verification for financial reasons.

Humans can be tracked just like your dog or cat. The first id chips were put in pets. Today 70,000 shelters and veterinarians in American can scan a lost or injured animal and find the owner, in seconds.

In fact, Verichip has yet to land its first domestic account.

VeriChip, of course, is a similar RFID technology that is in the Surgichip (which is noninvasive), covered earlier here and here. Competition for human bar-coding is heating up, without any visible enthusiasm among the general public to be tagged (at least invasively tagged).

Our bet: invasive RFIDing will only be done for death row inmates (if at all...), and otherwise will not be accepted by the general public. Would you want to be invasively RFID'ed?

More at VeriChip...

email this article to a friend      print this!           comments and peer reviews (3)






replies: 3 comments
Open comments are not moderated, although abusive and vulgar remarks may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Medgadget.com. Please consult our disclaimer.

I agree, I would not want to have a chip in me and then if I want it removed the dangers of that stuff leaking into my blood stream. My dog, after being spaded, ended up having something like that put in between her shoulder blades and when she ran away, the dog catcher was able to bring her home because he read her "tracke". It was good for her to be found but I feel she would've come home without it. So to be put in me or my family seems like it's the propesy being fullfilled.


Posted by: VNor
on April 14, 2006 10:58 AM GMT

sorry--no chip for me--Ill have nothing to do with techno slavery


Posted by: star
on July 26, 2006 06:26 PM GMT

For anyone who believes in God, and knows the bible... I strongly believe this is the mark of the beast. That is ridiculous NO WAY would I have that thing put in me.. NEVER. I wouldn't even let it be done to my pet, these people are insane and I've heard they are going to try to make it manditory to put them in babies when they are born. Absolutely no way my newborn is getting a chip put in them.. I pray that they let this idea go because it will be the demise of the earth. God Bless Everyone!


Posted by: Danielle
on September 29, 2006 10:47 PM GMT